Is 90% carbon capture enough ?
Plans are afoot for another energy development project in Scotland. The difference is that this time it is from the other side of the fence. A US-led consortium called the Summit Power Group is intending to build a “clean” coal based power plant in Grangemouth. The plan is that the plant will be designed to capture over 90% of CO2 emissions once it begins generating energy.
However Summit Power have made it quite clear that whilst they are happy to build their new carbon capture and storage facility in Scotland the plan will only go ahead if they win some serious financial backing from UK’s next carbon capture and storage (CCS) funding round.
The proposal is titled the Caledonia Clean Energy project and has been hailed as one of the most ambitious yet in the highly competitive race to build a fully functioning commercial carbon power station in the UK.
A number of CCS proposals from all over the UK have already been shot down for one reason or another. That includes Longannet in Fife which at that time was one of the most developed projects in the UK. Another application from PEEL Energy to apply some CCS technology on their new coal-fired plant in Ayrshire was met with the largest number of objections in Scottish planning history.
However environmental groups are worried that whilst Summit Power Group’s plans for 90% carbon capture are a great move for the environment. The fact that they intend to use the CO2 captured to pump out oil from hard to reach places has resulted in massive concerns from environmental and wildlife groups – with many stating they will only lend support if this element of the plan is removed.
What are your thoughts on the proposal, is it a fair deal?


